Another profitable company with well-compensated executives wants its employees to give a little.
So it should be no surprise that there’s an unusual event going on right now — a massive strike by workers. About 45,000 Verizon workers went on strike this week because contract negotiations have stalled.
I say the event unusual because strikes in the country have been on the decline for years. The number of major U.S. strikes, including those involving 1,000 workers or more, fell to just five in 2009, the lowest level since 1947, when the Department of Labor first began tracking the data.
“The bottom line is that unions know the strike weapon just doesn’t work that well anymore, especially in a tough economy,” said Phillip Wilson, president of the Labor Relations Institute.
But for some reason, Verizon’s workers think it can work, or maybe they’re just so frustrated they don’t know what else to do. You see, the company is quite profitable right now but company officials say they still need major concessions from employees. It’s a familiar story many workers have heard before, especially during this downturn. Workers are seeing their pay and benefits cut, in addition to ongoing furloughs without pay, but all the while the top dogs keep padding their bank accounts.
In the case of Verizon, the top six executives at the company pocketed about $45 million in compensation last year. When you compare that to average wages at the firm for the rank and file that seems pretty extreme during tough economic times. Software engineers at the company, who are not unionized, make about $87,000, and customer service reps, many of which are unionized get $16.64 on average, according to Glassdoor.com.
Executives at Verizon make 20 times more than their top-paid employees, and nearly 60 times more than what their lowest paid workers bring in.
The pay gap between employees and executives has been growing for years now across all industries, but companies still want to extract more and more from the rank and file.
What if there was a company that limited how much more the head honchos could make compared to the little guys and gals? Am I crazy to even suggest this? Did I not have enough coffee this morning? Turns out, there is one such company.
I recently bought a bottle of Seventh Generation multi-surface cleaner. Why? Because I read in an article published in The Nation by Gar Alperovitz, a Professor of Political Economy at the University of Maryland, College Park Department of Government and Politics, that the company actually had such a policy.
A different large-scale corporation, Seventh Generation—the nation’s leader in “green” detergents, dishwashing soap, baby wipes, tissues, paper towels and other household products—has internal policies requiring that no one be paid more than fourteen times the lowest base pay or five times higher than the average employee.
I went to the company’s site and sure enough it spells out this policy:
Our new CEO Chuck Maniscalco has maintained our policy of ensuring that no one’s base salary will be more than 14 times the lowest paid full-time employee and no more than five times the average employee.
It’s not a crazy idea after all. Maybe Verizon’s union negotiators should put this on the table.
August 10th, 2011 at 10:25 am
Workers are dispensable this is why companies like Verizon exploit its own. The private sector doesn’t want to understand the social aspect of an employee and the executives want to be lionised for giving folk a job. If all unskilled labour stopped tomorrow countries around the world could not function yet the power to switch off and disable a nation has never been abused by workers. Why? because people prefer to work for a living wage and feel they;re making a contribution to society. That admirable ethic is being crushed by the insatiable greed of large corporations and senior management who no longer appreciate those who get things done on the shop floor.
Workers are workers not slaves not stupid and not deserving of exploitation. Reward their loyalty don’t abuse it.
August 10th, 2011 at 11:07 am
You’d think stockholders would be in favor of such limitations, because reigning in executive compensation is a sure way to bolster the bottom line (even after reallocating some of the saving to bolster rank and file compensation).
August 10th, 2011 at 3:42 pm
I think this is a conversation we should be having. But so many think it goes to the heart of what capitalism is all about…let people make what they can. Unfortunately, it’s only a small minority that end up with the big paychecks.
August 11th, 2011 at 11:42 am
Verizon has never been my favorite company but they have a virtual monopoly in my area. Recently I needed copies of bills from an account my company closed earlier this year, and the strike has impacted the call volume. Verizon has NO contingency plan for dealing with a strike, and instead, their phone messages say “We’re sorry, because of a strike we can’t answer your call” and then you get disconnected.
At one point, I got a fellow on an online chat service and when I said I couldn’t get through via phone, he said, “Well, there’s a strike on, and that’s making our job hard.” I told him I thought the company’s treatment of its workers was reprehensible and it was more reprehensible that the company was blaming the union for its inability to serve its customers.
And I’ve always been a fan of Seventh Generation, but that salary policy makes me even more so.