No unemployment check for you…
Everyone is celebrating now that Congress passed a 13-week extension of unemployment benefits, on top of the 26 weeks already provided.
But many of you shouldn’t be breaking out the champagne.
If you get laid off tomorrow will you get an unemployment check?
Maybe not.
Have you checked your state lately to find out how long you’re supposed to be working for an employer before you’re eligible for jobless benefits?
In many states, you have to be working full time for a company for a few years and make a certain threshold income before you qualify.
“Most people who lose their jobs these days don’t qualify for any unemployment at all,” said Robert Reich, the former U.S. Labor Secretary under Clinton, on the Marketplace Morning Report this morning. Here’s an audio of the piece:
The economic world has changed a lot since the federal government encouraged states to adopt unemployment insurance in 1935, but no one seemed to notice.
The unemployment system made sense decades ago, Reich says, when people were in the same full-time job for years and one breadwinner could sustain a whole family.
But today, he adds, when people are going from job to job, and a growing number of individuals have several part time jobs or are contractors, a gigantic economic black hole is left for a huge number of working Americans to fall into.
“It’s a disgrace that most Americans that loose their jobs don’t qualify,” Reich maintains. “Congress should expand coverage in these perilous times.”
Expanding the benefits by 13 weeks was a good thing. I’m not knocking it. But it will do little to help American workers if they can’t even qualify for one day.
July 9th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
Mr. Reich states: “in order to be eligible (for unemployment benefits), most states require you to have been working in the job you lost full-time, and for a certain number of years”. No state has ever had this requirement. Eligibility is based on wages earned in the last 12-18 months. These wages can be from many employers and may include part-time or full time work. A few clicks to any state unemployment website will confirm this. I suggest we should be more concerned about the majority of states that are increasingly underfunded. According to the DOL, 33 states have deficient trust funds.
July 9th, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Mark, It turns out many states do deny unemployment insurance to part time workers.
This is from the Economic Policy Institute, (http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_snapshots_09012004)
“part-time minimum wage workers who have sufficient earnings to qualify for benefits are still denied UI benefits in 22 states because of restrictive eligibility rules requiring them to be available for and seeking full-time work”
I’m also looking to see whether most states require a year of employment. I’ve researched about six states so far and indeed the number for those is 12 months. I haven’t been able to find a lot of information on whether it can be from multiple employers.
Also, very interesting point on the funding. That is a major issue.