Death at work is unacceptable…
UPDATE BELOW –
Is our government turning a blind eye to worker injuries, and even death?
I know you’ve all heard a bit about the deadly sugar plant explosion in Georgia. Maybe you caught a bit of the story on the nightly news. Yet another accident kills workers. We let these stories just disappear into the next day’s news. Remember the mine workers in Utah? Probably not.
I don’t blame you. We get bombarded with news everyday. We all hope someone investigates these tragedies. We all hope someone, or some agency, or some corporations is held accountable. The sugar refinery tragedy was heart wrenching.
From the Associated Press:
SAVANNAH, Ga.—A vase of red roses sat in front of the church altar Saturday, flanked by portraits of Truitt Byers and a blue baseball cap with the logo for Dixie Crystals—the brand of sugar produced by a refinery where the 54-year-old was killed in an explosion.
The first memorial services for Byers and the other victims came a day after crews recovered the final body from inside the Imperial Sugar refinery in Port Wentworth west of Savannah. The explosion killed nine people Feb. 7—eight found dead inside the plant, and a ninth worker who died of burns at an Augusta hospital.
The major question is: Could these accidents have been prevented? In this case, the answer might be yes.
Independent federal safety officials in 2006 had urged the government’s main arm protecting worker safety, OSHA, to adopt new standards to protect workers against deadly dust explosions, like the one at the Imperial Sugar facility in Georgia.
But, unfortunately, those new regulations were not adopted. The federal group that urged OSHA to adopt those standards is called the Chemical Safety Board. The Board had been concerned about similar explosions caused by dust at other facilities and in 2003 investigated three horrific cases.
This from the Board’s website discussing the three incidents:
One at West Pharmaceutical Services in Kinston, North Carolina, where plastic powder that had accumulated above a suspended ceiling exploded, killed six and gravely injured many others. At CTA Acoustics in Corbin, Kentucky, phenolic resin - another plastic powder - exploded killing 7 and again injuring many others. And at the Hayes-Lemmerz automobile wheel plant in Indiana, aluminum powder exploded killing another worker. That plant has since closed. Both the other plants had to be demolished and rebuilt.
After investigating the explosions and after undertaking a large study into industrial dust explosions,
“The Board identified 281 fires and explosions over a 25-year period that took 119 lives and caused 718 injuries. Some 24% of these incidents took place in the food industry. Pursuant to its findings the Board made several recommendations - including recommendations to OSHA - which OSHA has so far partly acted on. But the tragic event that occurred here in Savannah demonstrates that the problem of dust explosions in industry has yet to be solved. It is a problem that requires further attention.
So what happened? What does “OSHA has so far partly acted on” mean? I left a message for the press person at the Chemical Safety Board to explain exactly what that meant.[See the note from a CSB spokesman in the comments.]
Is OSHA doing a good enough job protecting workers from injury?A story in the News & Observer published Feb. 10 worries me. Did anyone see this?
OSHA lets employers underreport workers’ injuries, official says
Kerry Hall and Ames Alexander, The Charlotte Observer
Bob Whitmore is doing what few career government employees dare — publicly criticizing his own agency.
Whitmore, chief of record-keeping requirements for the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, said OSHA is allowing employers to vastly underreport the number of injuries and illnesses their workers suffer. The true rate for some industries — including poultry processors — is likely two to three times what government numbers suggest, he said. Whitmore is not authorized to speak for the government and is risking his job simply by talking to the Charlotte Observer, he said.
“I want to hold people accountable that are abusing workers,” he said. “It’s as simple as that.” OSHA officials say they look for underreporting but rarely find it. Whitmore has directed OSHA’s record-keeping system since 1988. Early in his career, he said, OSHA looked closely at companies’ injury and illness logs and issued big fines to businesses that underreported such incidents. But by the 1990s, he said, industry groups and pro-business lawmakers were accusing OSHA of focusing on what they perceived as frivolous paperwork violations.
Today, he said, the agency is conducting fewer inspections and issuing fewer fines, leaving businesses to police themselves. The government, he said, has no clear picture of the hazards that lurk inside some of America’s most dangerous manufacturers. A leading manufacturers group disagrees, contending that the government figures are accurate. While underreporting occasionally happens, it’s rare, Hank Cox, a spokesman for the National Association of Manufacturers, contends.
In July, Whitmore was placed on administrative leave after a confrontation with a supervisor. He said the supervisor spat on him, so he stuck his foot in the man’s door and threatened, “If you ever do that again, I’ll kick your [rear].” Whitmore has filed a complaint alleging a hostile workplace. As of this month, he was still on administrative leave. The Labor Department declined to comment on Whitmore’s status, citing “privacy considerations.”
Supposedly, OSHA’s budget has not kept pace with inflation in the past few years. Has that led to worker deaths? I don’t know. But we need to review how safety regulations are implemented in this country. Whenever there is even one death, we all should sit up and wonder why.
[UPDATE: From a union representing sugar industry workers at other facilities:
Washington, D.C. - Leading worker organizations today called on the
U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) to issue an emergency standard on combustible
dust. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW)
and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters filed a petition with the
U.S. Department of Labor demanding that OSHA follow the 2006
recommendations of the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB). Additional
labor organizations representing workers at risk are also supporting the
petition which was filed in reaction to a workplace explosion at a sugar
refinery in Georgia on February 7.
February 18th, 2008 at 10:12 pm
OSHA said it would do some of what the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) recommended. Last year OSHA announced a national emphasis program to increase enforcement of existing standards related to combustible dust. But OSHA has not responded to the CSB’s 2006 safety recommendation to establish a comprehensive regulatory standard to prevent major dust explosions. Right now there is no such standard for general industry. The CSB also recommended more training of OSHA inspectors to recognize dust explosion hazards, and better communication of dust hazards to workers.
Daniel Horowitz
CSB Director of Public Affairs
Washington, DC
February 18th, 2008 at 10:53 pm
If OSHA had responded to CSB’s 2006 safety recommendation to establish a comprehensive regulatory standard to prevent major dust explosions could this tragedy at the Imperial Sugar facility have been prevented?
February 19th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
It’s too early in the investigation to say specifically what might have prevented this tragedy. The CSB will be looking at what kinds of building designs, engineering safeguards, work practices, and training were in place at Imperial Sugar to prevent dust explosions, but we can’t draw any conclusions at this point. There’s more information about what the CSB recommended to OSHA in 2006 here:
http://www.csb.gov/index.cfm?folder=completed_investigations&page=info&INV_ID=53
Daniel Horowitz
CSB Director of Public Affairs
Washington, DC
February 20th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Eve, do you believe we could ever create a no-risk work environment? Some jobs have intrinsic risk. It’s easy to see and accept this risk when dealing with police or firefighters, but risk is still part of working in mines, drive truck, or working in a convenience store. While I do believe government should help ensure that companies do not operate with a wanton disregard for employee safety, I also believe that it will never be possible to prevent all loss of life on the job.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
My argument is that dying on the job is unacceptable if it can be prevented. It’s hard to say definitively at this point, but there’s a question out there — did OSHA have the power to prevent it if the agency followed the CSB’s recommendations in 2006?
There are jobs that are dangerous and the risks of injury or death are high, but if safeguards can be put in place to protect those workers, then they should be. No?
February 20th, 2008 at 4:06 pm
I agree that there should be reasonable safeguards, and that current safety policies, procedures, and guidance should be followed (or implemented) in a timely manner. I’m just saying that, in some cases, accidents will still happen. Some of those might even be judged to be preventable, but such predictions rely on perfect foreknowledge or perfect prevention systems. Sometimes, things will fail. Sometimes, accidents will happen.
February 20th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
You are right, accidents will happen. Let’s hope this wasn’t one of those preventable ones.